Comments on: What Fred Thompson Needs to Know About the Human Life Amendment http://janechastain.com/2007/11/08/what-fred-thompson-needs-to-know-about-the-human-life-amendment/ Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:37:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Bob http://janechastain.com/2007/11/08/what-fred-thompson-needs-to-know-about-the-human-life-amendment/#comment-387 Bob Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:39:56 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=10#comment-387 Nice Site! Thanks! Nice Site! Thanks!

]]> By: Clay Byrom http://janechastain.com/2007/11/08/what-fred-thompson-needs-to-know-about-the-human-life-amendment/#comment-45 Clay Byrom Sun, 11 Nov 2007 03:00:29 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=10#comment-45 Jane, Fred Thompson is not Ronald Reagan. Richard Nixon even said that Thompson was dumb. It is becoming more and more obvious that Thompson is not real introspective, and that he would be okay as president but not great. The only Republican candidate who can defeat Hillary is Rudy Giuliani. I take Giuliani at his word that he will appoint strict constructionists to the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, he will be far better than Bush at protecting the borders, and will be an upgrade over Bush in others ways in fighting terrorism. Jane,

Fred Thompson is not Ronald Reagan. Richard Nixon even said that Thompson was dumb. It is becoming more and more obvious that Thompson is not real introspective, and that he would be okay as president but not great. The only Republican candidate who can defeat Hillary is Rudy Giuliani. I take Giuliani at his word that he will appoint strict constructionists to the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, he will be far better than Bush at protecting the borders, and will be an upgrade over Bush in others ways in fighting terrorism.

]]> By: Mark Rizzo http://janechastain.com/2007/11/08/what-fred-thompson-needs-to-know-about-the-human-life-amendment/#comment-44 Mark Rizzo Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:52:15 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=10#comment-44 Jane, I agree with your point. A right as fundamental as life is what our Constitution is about. Our Constitution has been amended for huge issues like the abolition of slavery which was not specifically enumerated when it was originally drafted. Ronald Reagan was clear in his communication about the right to life of an unborn child. He didn't defer to a comment on state's rights when revealing his thoughts on abortion. I understand the point Thompson is attempting to make on state's rights; that the federal government has usurpted the duties and rights of states. However, I believe he is missing the fact that an amedment to the Constitution declaring an unborn child's right to live in his or her's mother's womb would clearly be within the orignial intent of the Constituion. I like Fred Thompson and believe he is a viable candidate who has what it takes to not only be President, but someone who could win against another Clinton. But he must clarify his stand in order to rally Conservatives who would like to support someone like a Ronald Reagan. Jane, I agree with your point. A right as fundamental as life is what our Constitution
is about. Our Constitution has been amended for huge issues like the abolition
of slavery which was not specifically enumerated when it was originally drafted.
Ronald Reagan was clear in his communication about the right to life of an unborn
child. He didn’t defer to a comment on state’s rights when revealing his
thoughts on abortion. I understand the point Thompson is attempting to make on state’s rights; that the federal government has usurpted the duties and rights of states. However, I believe he is missing the fact that an amedment to the Constitution
declaring an unborn child’s right to live in his or her’s mother’s womb would clearly be within the orignial intent of the Constituion. I like Fred Thompson and believe he is
a viable candidate who has what it takes to not only be President, but someone
who could win against another Clinton. But he must clarify his stand in order to
rally Conservatives who would like to support someone like a Ronald Reagan.

]]> By: Dressnef.Com » What Fred Thompson Needs to Know About the Human Life Amendment http://janechastain.com/2007/11/08/what-fred-thompson-needs-to-know-about-the-human-life-amendment/#comment-43 Dressnef.Com » What Fred Thompson Needs to Know About the Human Life Amendment Fri, 09 Nov 2007 06:11:25 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=10#comment-43 [...] wrote an interesting post today on What Fred Thompson Needs to Know About the Human Life AmendmentHere’s a quick [...] [...] wrote an interesting post today on What Fred Thompson Needs to Know About the Human Life AmendmentHere’s a quick [...]

]]> By: Chris http://janechastain.com/2007/11/08/what-fred-thompson-needs-to-know-about-the-human-life-amendment/#comment-41 Chris Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:16:45 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=10#comment-41 The learning curve required by people today in understanding what Federalism means to us is rather frustratingly slow. It demonstrates just how ludicrous our education system truly is but, it's not too late to wake up and smell the coffee. Judicial Activism is directly to blame for nationwide abortion, redefining marriage and undermining our family as an institution. Screwing around with our Constitution to overcome this is a wrongheaded and grave mistake in knee-jerking a solution for a symptom...it is also not our instructions on how to proceed to correct wrongs. Deal with the cause by appointing strict constructionist judges and boot the black-robed, self-appointed gods who are apparently above our separation of powers out. Fred has discussed Federalism many times and defines it for anyone willing to learn what they should already know here; http://www.fred08.com/Virtual/Federalism.aspx You will then appreciate anyone offering to amend our Constitution for such wrongheaded reasons couldn't possibly be considered to occupy the highest office of our land nor be given the pen which supposedly writes the goals of our party of values...By the way, I don't remember voting for the people who did and I would like impeachment hearings to begin immediately. Wake up Jane, this article of Tarzan chest-thumping equals nothing more than the emotional outbreaks of Cheeta. You want, what you want, when you want it but, you'll have to rely on the adults to give you what you need in the correct way. The learning curve required by people today in understanding what Federalism means to us is rather frustratingly slow. It demonstrates just how ludicrous our education system truly is but, it’s not too late to wake up and smell the coffee.

Judicial Activism is directly to blame for nationwide abortion, redefining marriage and undermining our family as an institution. Screwing around with our Constitution to overcome this is a wrongheaded and grave mistake in knee-jerking a solution for a symptom…it is also not our instructions on how to proceed to correct wrongs.
Deal with the cause by appointing strict constructionist judges and boot the black-robed, self-appointed gods who are apparently above our separation of powers out.

Fred has discussed Federalism many times and defines it for anyone willing to learn what they should already know here;
http://www.fred08.com/Virtual/Federalism.aspx

You will then appreciate anyone offering to amend our Constitution for such wrongheaded reasons couldn’t possibly be considered to occupy the highest office of our land nor be given the pen which supposedly writes the goals of our party of values…By the way, I don’t remember voting for the people who did and I would like impeachment hearings to begin immediately.

Wake up Jane, this article of Tarzan chest-thumping equals nothing more than the emotional outbreaks of Cheeta. You want, what you want, when you want it but, you’ll have to rely on the adults to give you what you need in the correct way.

]]>