Comments on: Why President Giuliani is my WORST Nightmare http://janechastain.com/2007/11/29/why-president-giuliani-is-my-worst-nightmare/ Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:33:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Melody http://janechastain.com/2007/11/29/why-president-giuliani-is-my-worst-nightmare/#comment-175 Melody Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:10:58 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=32#comment-175 Jane, This has really opened my eyes! I have been thinking about what you said last night about Romney. I am thinking that you might be right...there is NO way that he can back down now, he has painted himself in a corner, like you said and he might be the best choice for conservatives right now. I am going to do some more research! Blessings!!! Jane,

This has really opened my eyes! I have been thinking about what you said last night about Romney. I am thinking that you might be right…there is NO way that he can back down now, he has painted himself in a corner, like you said and he might be the best choice for conservatives right now.

I am going to do some more research!

Blessings!!!

]]> By: Fredric Butler http://janechastain.com/2007/11/29/why-president-giuliani-is-my-worst-nightmare/#comment-151 Fredric Butler Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:42:08 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=32#comment-151 Ranchers and farmers have an affinity for the FREE MARKET when they also happen to be the "hands-on" owners of their spreads or farms; these folks do not have an "employee" mindset; rather they would risk the travails and hardships that they suffer from weather, the lack of parity between costs and returns, and the solitude of their workplace from the interference and meddling of the "Dude" in Washington that assumes the role of a seer and precursor of these risks - or from he outrageous fortune of it all. "Farm Subsidy" is the brainchild of the "Dude", and it is egregious in its intrusion into the affairs of the American farmer or rancher - the last of the breed; e.g., the American Cowboy, the Dirt Farmer, and that ilk. Guiliani, the "Dude" out of NY, knows little of "Heartland America", and this bread basket to the world; ergo, the closest he gets to this workplace is in one of those swank eateries in Manhattan; as I read him and your recent column, the "good" Mayor would enter the agricultural market place no different than his constituents (corporate agri-business) have in the past, and leave the Cowboy, the Dirt Farmer, the "Hand" as chafe in the wind. Find me a Cowboy, a Dirt Farmer, a Philospher, a "hand to play" and run for the job of President, and I will play the game of politics, and vote for risky and free market; otherwise, I would rather be the chafe, residue and dregs of the folly that is fomented by these subsidies. Ranchers and farmers have an affinity for the FREE MARKET when they also happen to be the “hands-on” owners of their spreads or farms; these folks do not have an “employee” mindset; rather they would risk the travails and hardships that they suffer from weather, the lack of parity between costs and returns, and the solitude of their workplace from the interference and meddling of the “Dude” in Washington that assumes the role of a seer and precursor of these risks - or from he outrageous fortune of it all. “Farm Subsidy” is the brainchild of the “Dude”, and it is egregious in its intrusion into the affairs of the American farmer or rancher - the last of the breed; e.g., the American Cowboy, the Dirt Farmer, and that ilk.

Guiliani, the “Dude” out of NY, knows little of “Heartland America”, and this bread basket to the world; ergo, the closest he gets to this workplace is in one of those swank eateries in Manhattan; as I read him and your recent column, the “good” Mayor would enter the agricultural market place no different than his constituents (corporate agri-business) have in the past, and leave the Cowboy, the Dirt Farmer, the “Hand” as chafe in the wind. Find me a Cowboy, a Dirt Farmer, a Philospher, a “hand to play” and run for the job of President, and I will play the game of politics, and vote for risky and free market; otherwise, I would rather be the chafe, residue and dregs of the folly that is fomented by these subsidies.

]]> By: John McClain http://janechastain.com/2007/11/29/why-president-giuliani-is-my-worst-nightmare/#comment-90 John McClain Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:53:26 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=32#comment-90 Dear Ms. Chastain, As I look upon the putative candidates that are paraded before the public, I have to think that the fact that Mrs. Clinton is a lead on any ticket, is sufficient evidence that the general "electorate" is not qualified to select a candidate based on historic and anticipated performance. I don't know any of the so called "republican candidates" to "know" they are strict Constitutionalists, that they are republicans in a very real desire to return this Nation to its republican roots, and actually root out the socialist aspects of both the vast federal wasteland, as well as the similar socialist laws and departments of the individual states. If any next elected President fails to actually turn the Nation around and successfully start the process of disassembling the IRS, the department of education, the social security department, just to name a few, we will have failed to stop the forward motion of the Nation towards our imminent destruction, and it is quite possible that the Jihadis will be able to sit around and wait until we have lost control of our government completely, and at that point, they would be able to simply step in and push through their agenda from an international seat of authority. Failing to end all the various initiatives intended to broaden the direct power of the U.N., and to give the U.N. its own source of funding that can no longer be denied by a Nation delivering it, but can be altered at the whim of those in the high councils, will mean the end of National sovereignty at some point and it won't matter much if it is sooner rather than later, unless "later" means substantial numbers of American citizens have seen the truth and thus prepare for repelling the application of "global authority" on our own government. We know that we cannot expect any of the branches of our federal government to do anything except empower those who are trying to reach a state of world governance, even though such a thing would mean an end to any power and authority in their own, individual office. At least with a Mrs. Clinton white house, the enemy is known, and she can be expected to operate as we have long observed, and thus we can oppose her administration in a way that no putative "republican" administration would ever be opposed. Sincerely, John McClain Vanceboro, NC Dear Ms. Chastain,
As I look upon the putative candidates that are paraded before the public, I have to think that the fact that Mrs. Clinton is a lead on any ticket, is sufficient evidence that the general “electorate” is not qualified to select a candidate based on historic and anticipated performance. I don’t know any of the so called “republican candidates” to “know” they are strict Constitutionalists, that they are republicans in a very real desire to return this Nation to its republican roots, and actually root out the socialist aspects of both the vast federal wasteland, as well as the similar socialist laws and departments of the individual states.
If any next elected President fails to actually turn the Nation around and successfully start the process of disassembling the IRS, the department of education, the social security department, just to name a few, we will have failed to stop the forward motion of the Nation towards our imminent destruction, and it is quite possible that the Jihadis will be able to sit around and wait until we have lost control of our government completely, and at that point, they would be able to simply step in and push through their agenda from an international seat of authority.
Failing to end all the various initiatives intended to broaden the direct power of the U.N., and to give the U.N. its own source of funding that can no longer be denied by a Nation delivering it, but can be altered at the whim of those in the high councils, will mean the end of National sovereignty at some point and it won’t matter much if it is sooner rather than later, unless “later” means substantial numbers of American citizens have seen the truth and thus prepare for repelling the application of “global authority” on our own government.
We know that we cannot expect any of the branches of our federal government to do anything except empower those who are trying to reach a state of world governance, even though such a thing would mean an end to any power and authority in their own, individual office.
At least with a Mrs. Clinton white house, the enemy is known, and she can be expected to operate as we have long observed, and thus we can oppose her administration in a way that no putative “republican” administration would ever be opposed.
Sincerely,
John McClain
Vanceboro, NC

]]> By: John Coleman http://janechastain.com/2007/11/29/why-president-giuliani-is-my-worst-nightmare/#comment-89 John Coleman Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:30:11 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=32#comment-89 I agree wholeheartedly about Mr. Giuliani. He is utterly untrustworthy. No more voting "for the lesser of two evils" for me. I would rather see myself President of the United States than a two-faced serial polygamist like Giuliani. I agree wholeheartedly about Mr. Giuliani. He is utterly untrustworthy. No more voting “for the lesser of two evils” for me. I would rather see myself President of the United States than a two-faced serial polygamist like Giuliani.

]]> By: Jane Chastain http://janechastain.com/2007/11/29/why-president-giuliani-is-my-worst-nightmare/#comment-88 Jane Chastain Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:37:54 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=32#comment-88 What makes you think -- "believe" -- you can trust him on the judges? What makes you think — “believe” — you can trust him on the judges?

]]> By: Bob Hollmann http://janechastain.com/2007/11/29/why-president-giuliani-is-my-worst-nightmare/#comment-87 Bob Hollmann Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:38:01 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=32#comment-87 Your article raises a lot of questions. I agree that Rudy is primarily a liberal, but I do believe he will appoint "judges in the image of Scalia, Alito and Roberts." My preference would be to see someone else be the republican candidiate, but if it is Rudy against Hillary, I will have to vote for Rudy. A third party candidate would lead to complete defeat and the election of Hillary. Some people say you should vote for the lesser of two evils. I say rather, you should vote for the lesser evil. There is a difference. Weigh all the beliefs of the candidates and choose the lesser evil, that is, the one who will bring good judges. That, after all, is the only truly long lasting legacy a President can leave. Thanks for listening, Bob Hollmann, Cheyenne, WY Your article raises a lot of questions. I agree that Rudy is primarily a liberal, but I do believe he will appoint “judges in the image of Scalia, Alito and Roberts.” My preference would be to see someone else be the republican candidiate, but if it is Rudy against Hillary, I will have to vote for Rudy. A third party candidate would lead to complete defeat and the election of Hillary. Some people say you should vote for the lesser of two evils. I say rather, you should vote for the lesser evil. There is a difference. Weigh all the beliefs of the candidates and choose the lesser evil, that is, the one who will bring good judges. That, after all, is the only truly long lasting legacy a President can leave.

Thanks for listening,
Bob Hollmann, Cheyenne, WY

]]> By: Jane Chastain http://janechastain.com/2007/11/29/why-president-giuliani-is-my-worst-nightmare/#comment-86 Jane Chastain Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:26:22 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=32#comment-86 I think you need to re-read my column. He throws the names of Roberts and Scalia around a lot but it was Scalia who wrote the dissenting opinion in the case he brought before the Supreme Court to destroy the Line Item Veto. Also, why did he appoint so many liberal justices in New York? If you honestly believe that Rudy will appoint strict constructionists -- in the true sense of the word -- to the high count, than he has a bridge he'd like to sell you. I think you need to re-read my column. He throws the names of Roberts and Scalia around a lot but it was Scalia who wrote the dissenting opinion in the case he brought before the Supreme Court to destroy the Line Item Veto.

Also, why did he appoint so many liberal justices in New York?

If you honestly believe that Rudy will appoint strict constructionists — in the true sense of the word — to the high count, than he has a bridge he’d like to sell you.

]]> By: ROS http://janechastain.com/2007/11/29/why-president-giuliani-is-my-worst-nightmare/#comment-85 ROS Fri, 30 Nov 2007 04:48:45 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=32#comment-85 YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING!!! AND YOU CALL YOURSELF A REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE? I GUESS YOU'D RATHER HAVE LIBERAL JUSTICES APPOINTED TO THE SUPREME COURT [LIKE RUTH BADER GINSBURG] THAN CONSTRUCTIONINST JUDGES LIKE ROBERTS AND SCALIA. AND, BY THE WAY, JANE, WHEN HILLARY GETS ELECTED, AND THE U.S. GETS HIT BY ANOTHER TERRORIST ATTACK, DON'T FORGET TO TAKE "CREDIT" FOR THAT. I'M VOTING FOR RUDY. YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING!!! AND YOU CALL YOURSELF A REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE? I GUESS YOU’D RATHER HAVE LIBERAL JUSTICES APPOINTED TO THE SUPREME COURT [LIKE RUTH BADER GINSBURG] THAN CONSTRUCTIONINST JUDGES LIKE ROBERTS AND SCALIA.

AND, BY THE WAY, JANE, WHEN HILLARY GETS ELECTED, AND THE U.S. GETS HIT BY ANOTHER TERRORIST ATTACK, DON’T FORGET TO TAKE “CREDIT” FOR THAT.

I’M VOTING FOR RUDY.

]]> By: Jane Chastain http://janechastain.com/2007/11/29/why-president-giuliani-is-my-worst-nightmare/#comment-84 Jane Chastain Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:44:10 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=32#comment-84 Darrel, I agree with what you said about how we got there -- but we are there and to leave now would be dangerous to us and a disaster for the people in Iraq. Colin Powell was correct when he said, "You break it. You fix it." Yes to Germany and Bosnia. No to Korea. And yes, I would put them on the border. As for your comment on WND, True, but our editor put those stories on the front page. It wasn't for a lack of material. Darrel,

I agree with what you said about how we got there — but we are there and to leave now would be dangerous to us and a disaster for the people in Iraq. Colin Powell was correct when he said, “You break it. You fix it.”

Yes to Germany and Bosnia. No to Korea. And yes, I would put them on the border.

As for your comment on WND, True, but our editor put those stories on the front page. It wasn’t for a lack of material.

]]> By: Darrel Mulloy http://janechastain.com/2007/11/29/why-president-giuliani-is-my-worst-nightmare/#comment-83 Darrel Mulloy Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:09:04 +0000 http://janechastain.com/?p=32#comment-83 By the way, Jane, the two stories about Dr. Paul were not from WND but from other sources. By the way, Jane, the two stories about Dr. Paul were not from WND but from other sources.

]]>