<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill or Hill?  Who really ran the Clinton Administration?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:04:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 'ILLEGAL</title>
		<link>http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>'ILLEGAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 05:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-559</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;None...&lt;/strong&gt;

None...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>None&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>None&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakraft</title>
		<link>http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>jakraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-556</guid>
		<description>I knew back in 1992 that America had elected Lord and Lady MacBeth to the White House.  They came complete with their private cemetery for those who got in their way.  I feel sorry for Obama.  The closer he gets to the nomination, the more in danger his life is.  Hillary will not accept defeat or even a buyout like becoming Senate Majority Leader.  For her it is all or nothing and for such people, a Gotterdammerung for the country will be predictable if she does not get her way.  She is the consummate boomer, entitled to everything she wants to satisfy professed old emotional wounds from her family of origin.  She has to prove that there was at least one alpha male in her generation in her family of origin or die trying.  She surrounds herself with beta males at best.  She has all the grace of a Patton tank, all the kindness of a punch in the stomach and all the tenderness of a blizzard.  With Hillary as Bill’s nurse maid, he was much a victim as a beneficiary.  If and when she becomes President she needs him like a black widow spider needs its mate after mating.  I know she is a sociopath.  I wonder how much more will be provable and when.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew back in 1992 that America had elected Lord and Lady MacBeth to the White House.  They came complete with their private cemetery for those who got in their way.  I feel sorry for Obama.  The closer he gets to the nomination, the more in danger his life is.  Hillary will not accept defeat or even a buyout like becoming Senate Majority Leader.  For her it is all or nothing and for such people, a Gotterdammerung for the country will be predictable if she does not get her way.  She is the consummate boomer, entitled to everything she wants to satisfy professed old emotional wounds from her family of origin.  She has to prove that there was at least one alpha male in her generation in her family of origin or die trying.  She surrounds herself with beta males at best.  She has all the grace of a Patton tank, all the kindness of a punch in the stomach and all the tenderness of a blizzard.  With Hillary as Bill’s nurse maid, he was much a victim as a beneficiary.  If and when she becomes President she needs him like a black widow spider needs its mate after mating.  I know she is a sociopath.  I wonder how much more will be provable and when.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike2616</title>
		<link>http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>mike2616</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>The main factor that I think is being totally missed in all the articles I have read about this campaign, is how totally mesmerized the followers, both msm and individuals, are to obama.  Bill O refers to it as drinking koolaid.

This total dedication was hammered home when I saw a clip on the news of obama giving a speech on april 18, I believe in NC, and in that speech gave hillary the finger using the seinfeld technique so he could have plausible deniability.  Here you have a cadidate running for the highest office in the land and he so despises his opponent and has so little respect or regard for her that he flips her off.  And why does he do it?  Because he knows he can do anything, including giving his opponent the finger, and there is no one anywhere in the media or elsewhere with the cahones to call him on it.

Because of this, he is an incredibly dangerous candidate and would be even more dangerous if he ever got elected to the presidency.  Say what you will about Hillary, she has never, ever, flipped off an opponent during a major speech.  And the undeniable truth is in the last 20 years the best years we had were the 8 years her husband was president.  The dollar was strong and he left office with the budget well into surplus.

It is time to support the two lessers of three evils.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main factor that I think is being totally missed in all the articles I have read about this campaign, is how totally mesmerized the followers, both msm and individuals, are to obama.  Bill O refers to it as drinking koolaid.</p>
<p>This total dedication was hammered home when I saw a clip on the news of obama giving a speech on april 18, I believe in NC, and in that speech gave hillary the finger using the seinfeld technique so he could have plausible deniability.  Here you have a cadidate running for the highest office in the land and he so despises his opponent and has so little respect or regard for her that he flips her off.  And why does he do it?  Because he knows he can do anything, including giving his opponent the finger, and there is no one anywhere in the media or elsewhere with the cahones to call him on it.</p>
<p>Because of this, he is an incredibly dangerous candidate and would be even more dangerous if he ever got elected to the presidency.  Say what you will about Hillary, she has never, ever, flipped off an opponent during a major speech.  And the undeniable truth is in the last 20 years the best years we had were the 8 years her husband was president.  The dollar was strong and he left office with the budget well into surplus.</p>
<p>It is time to support the two lessers of three evils.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystere's moonbat slayer club</title>
		<link>http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>mystere's moonbat slayer club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Hi Jane,

I thought I&#039;d just drop by and see what you&#039;ve written lately...just like the good ol&#039; days at KBRT!  I wish Hillary would go away, but we all know what kind of liar she really is!  Let&#039;s say no to her in November if she becomes the nominee.  And if she doesn&#039;t and McCain gets into office, she&#039;ll be back in 2012, reminding us that she would have withdrawn the troops in 60 days (not to mention what disasters would really have happened had she gotten into office).  On the other hand, if she gets into office, it&#039;s look out America...right after San Francisco gets a 9/11 type of attack on 2 of its landmarks.  Now if Borat Insane Osama gets into office, she&#039;ll also be on the attack in 2012, and just as ruthless as ever!

Stay spiritually healthy!

E. E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jane,</p>
<p>I thought I&#8217;d just drop by and see what you&#8217;ve written lately&#8230;just like the good ol&#8217; days at KBRT!  I wish Hillary would go away, but we all know what kind of liar she really is!  Let&#8217;s say no to her in November if she becomes the nominee.  And if she doesn&#8217;t and McCain gets into office, she&#8217;ll be back in 2012, reminding us that she would have withdrawn the troops in 60 days (not to mention what disasters would really have happened had she gotten into office).  On the other hand, if she gets into office, it&#8217;s look out America&#8230;right after San Francisco gets a 9/11 type of attack on 2 of its landmarks.  Now if Borat Insane Osama gets into office, she&#8217;ll also be on the attack in 2012, and just as ruthless as ever!</p>
<p>Stay spiritually healthy!</p>
<p>E. E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay B</title>
		<link>http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-543</guid>
		<description>Jane,
 
Good column about the Clintons.  I didn&#039;t know that Rhodes Scholar Bill couldn&#039;t analyze and had trouble reaching conclusions.  Bill has always been more of a mystery to me than Hillary because I&#039;ve long known that Hillary is a cold, calculating leftist and socialist.  What much of the public doesn&#039;t know about Hillary, however, is that she is also bisexual. 
 
Meanwhile, it is obvious that appointments such as Janet Reno, Donna Shalala, and Madeleine Albright were Hillary&#039;s choices, and of course they weren&#039;t very good in their roles in the administration with Reno being possibly the worst attorney general ever.  
 
I don&#039;t think we have to be concerned about this now, but who would have been Hillary&#039;s secretary of defense had Hillary been elected president ?  I think that it may very well have been Patricia Schroeder.  Hillary probably would have found a role for Billie Jean King as well in her administration.
White men virtually need not have applied to have been in Hillary&#039;s administration.&lt;!--more--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane,</p>
<p>Good column about the Clintons.  I didn&#8217;t know that Rhodes Scholar Bill couldn&#8217;t analyze and had trouble reaching conclusions.  Bill has always been more of a mystery to me than Hillary because I&#8217;ve long known that Hillary is a cold, calculating leftist and socialist.  What much of the public doesn&#8217;t know about Hillary, however, is that she is also bisexual. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, it is obvious that appointments such as Janet Reno, Donna Shalala, and Madeleine Albright were Hillary&#8217;s choices, and of course they weren&#8217;t very good in their roles in the administration with Reno being possibly the worst attorney general ever.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we have to be concerned about this now, but who would have been Hillary&#8217;s secretary of defense had Hillary been elected president ?  I think that it may very well have been Patricia Schroeder.  Hillary probably would have found a role for Billie Jean King as well in her administration.<br />
White men virtually need not have applied to have been in Hillary&#8217;s administration.<!--more--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McClain</title>
		<link>http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>John McClain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janechastain.com/2008/04/10/bill-or-hill-who-really-ran-the-clinton-administration/#comment-541</guid>
		<description>I think this is the most cogent, unique argument regarding her role as has been put forth up to now.  I doubt the principle will fly, but I have no doubt that the writer&#039;s assertions are right on the money.  Unfortunately, this &quot;two for one sale&quot; was managed by the same kind of mind that manages those sorts of things in sales:  &quot;if it&#039;s not good enough to command the price you want, you put it &#039;on sale&#039; as a two for one, and just jack up the price a bit.  We are now paying the jacked up price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the most cogent, unique argument regarding her role as has been put forth up to now.  I doubt the principle will fly, but I have no doubt that the writer&#8217;s assertions are right on the money.  Unfortunately, this &#8220;two for one sale&#8221; was managed by the same kind of mind that manages those sorts of things in sales:  &#8220;if it&#8217;s not good enough to command the price you want, you put it &#8216;on sale&#8217; as a two for one, and just jack up the price a bit.  We are now paying the jacked up price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

