Comments on: Sarah Palin: Dumb like a Fox

By: Gwen

Gwen — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:04:55 +0000

Comments from readers about Sarah Palin’s inability to give a response that was not from a telepromter: So much emphasis on her but not on Biden’s numerous guffaws (he has hoof and mouth diesease) i.e. not even knowing which article of the US Constitution derives the authority and powers of the VP????? And how about Obama’s comment about 57 states and he has 1 more o go? The man got elected president and flubbed up on the number of states in the country where he presides. The unbalanced amount of attention to the most trivial details of everything about Palin versus the unsumountable overlooked corruptness, questionable character, smugness, etc of the Obama/Biden fellows shows that the liberals are indeed trying to blackball a 2012 run for president. As this presidental reign developes, our wallets are going to hit hard. Two years ago when Palin was elected govener of the great state of Alaska, she put billions of dollars of state money in savings. “Dumb” like a fox? Smarter than Wall Street

By: Flynn

Flynn — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:46:54 +0000

The fact that Sarah Palin is so ignorant is inconceivable to most of us, Ms. Chastain. It doesn’t mean she isn’t.

By: R.V. Windfield

R.V. Windfield — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:23:26 +0000

Nothing is more ignorant than: “The fact is that Palin knew nothing about the Supreme Court and couldn’t name any real newspaper that she read. She’s ignorant.”

It has and was never conceded that she knew “nothing about the Supreme Court” or that she couldn’t name any real newspaper that she read. These absolutes are the type of flavors found in every pack of Kool-Aid.

By: HistoryWriter

HistoryWriter — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:44:00 +0000

Dumb like a fox? No, just dumb like Sarah Palin. All one needs to do is listen to her impromptu remarks. Any fool can read prepared lines from a teleprompter, but the biggest dummies are the ones with limited knowledge who try to ad lib their way through. All Katie Kouric had to do for the public to see exactly how much of an intellectual cypher Palin is, was to let her talk. If the lady is seriously regarded as “the future of the Republican party” then the GOP had better be prepared for a very long, very cold winter —- perhaps three or four presidential terms worth.

By: Myguess

Myguess — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:44:02 +0000

The fact is that Palin knew nothing about the Supreme Court and couldn’t name any real newspaper that she read. She’s ignorant. Perhaps not stupid, but decidedly ignorant. What really turned off her detractors was the ugly combination, though, of ignorance and righteousness.

We’ve been there and done that w/ Bush. Most of our families lost ground under the man – and then got positively buried at the end of his term. Same ugly combination. Not gonna do THAT again.

By: Darrel Mulloy

Darrel Mulloy — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:58:02 +0000

In all of my 70 years I have never seen so much enthusiasm over a vice presidentoal candidate, especially one on a losing ticket. Sarah Palin is the best thing to happen to the Republican Party since Ronald Reagan. Let the neo-cons run her down as much as they want to; they are the ones that will be irrelivent in 2012, not Sarah.

By: KarenE

KarenE — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:59:57 +0000

This is an excellent clear headed analysis of the facts. This women was running for vice president, has a family including a special needs baby and was still governor of Alaska. It would take a serious “willing suspension of disbelief” to believe the rumors and gossip told about Sarah Palin. She has a record to refer to when judging the dubious stories and reports about her. It is ironic how obtuse the “smart people” are when it comes to determining what is most likely true or false.

By: Edward Endo

Edward Endo — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:23:39 +0000

Jane,

The rats and cockroaches have been exposed! I’m going to say this publicly: Obama will make so many blunders which will be costly in human lives during his presidency, and the public will be ready to toss him out of the White House. Hilary will likely chime in and remind the public that she would have pulled out the troops from Iraq in less than 60 days had she been elected. It’s time, meanwhile, to pray for the candidate God wants in office. Now I hope I don’t sound mean to say this, but I will anyways: MOONBATS: YOUR DAYS ARE NUMBERED!

Have a great day Jane!

By: Phoebe Leigh

Phoebe Leigh — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:54:54 +0000

Thank you! Who is the RNC protecting? It’s surely not Sarah Palin. There should be public repercussions. The salacious glee with which Cameron and Newsweek reported the mean girls gossip without even specifics stories or shopping receipts was appalling. Maybe before the internet this story might have been gone in a few days. Now – The reporters and the political aides need to watch themselves.

By: Patty

Patty — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:05:27 +0000

Great article Jane! You are doing what the media is supposed to do – expose the truth. Ironic how differently Sarah has been handled compared to her counterparts. Some of the problem may be her gender, but most of the problem seems to be her views. Too bad mainstream media won’t recant their accusations.
Sarah’s speech today at the Governors’ Conference reaffirms her desire to better this country and she will if given the chance. Will the GOP take the risk?
She is likeable, seemingly fearless, no nonsense and has strong leadership skills. Her moral compass is strong and she is what she is. what’s not to like? She scares the liberal elite and I say Go Sarah! You are a great role model for all women. Hunters would rather shoot at the eagles than the pigeons. Let em talk!