Educating Bernie

If you need more proof that Bernie Sanders is either dumber than a rock or bent on leading unsuspecting young people down the road to a Communist utopia from which there is no escape, I can provide it.

Consider his recent interview with the Hill TV, in which he told host Krystal Ball

“They (China) have made more progress in addressing extreme poverty than any country in the history of civilization. So they’ve done a lot of things for their people.”

After demonizing what he termed “far right leaders,” Benjamin Netanyahu and President Trump, Sanders offered a half-hearted disclaimer about China moving in a more authoritarian way.  Then the Democrat presidential candidate heaped the above praise on the Communist country.

Let’s be clear: Here in the United States no one has to live in “extreme poverty.”   That is what happens in countries that fall under a dictatorship.

Yes, we have alcoholics and drug addicts living on the streets of some major cities like Los Angeles, San Francisco and New York because their Democrat-led governments allow it and their friends at the ACLU sue to keep us from enforcing laws against loitering and pan-handling.   For those left-wing mayors and city council members, it’s all about the freedom to abuse yourself and live in squalor at the expense of others.

There are other options for these people, but many refuse the aid that is available to them. We can’t help them as long as we lack the will to get them off the streets.

Unfortunately, some of these people are mentally ill, but they can no longer be confined in hospitals against their will because the ACLU sued to turn them loose.  Yes, liberals love to blame President Reagan who closed many mental hospitals — after they were emptied by liberal jurists.

Apart from these unfortunate street people, those who are classified as poor in this country have a higher living standard than most of the middle class in the rest of the world.

Bernie is simply rehashing a flawed report on poverty in the U.S. issued last year by the United Nations Human Rights Council, whose members include such bastions of freedom and economic prosperity as Cuba, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia and Bangladesh.  It is laughable on the surface and pure rubbish underneath!

This report alleges that here in the U.S. 40 million live in poverty, 18.5 million in extreme poverty, and 5.3 million live in third-world conditions of absolute poverty.”

Robert Rector and Jamie Bryan Hall, two experts at the Heritage Foundation, have pointed out that it does have an veneer of legitimacy simply because of the way we compile our official poverty statistics.

We count only the cash income reported by these families each year, not the means-tested cash, food, housing, and medical benefits for low-income persons.  In other words, we omit roughly 95 percent of the $1.1 trillion U.S. taxpayers provide for them!

The UNHRC claims that 40 million Americans have incomes below the official U.S. poverty level of roughly $24,000 per year for a family of four.

Rector and Bryan write:  “In response to this claim, the U.S. Mission in Geneva cited our recent work showing that, since 1980, only 175 of  222,170 households—1 in 1,270, or 0.08 percent—included in the U.S. government’s official Consumer Expenditure Survey reported spending less than $4 per person per day.”  For comparison, the World Bank considers extreme poverty as those living on less that $1.90 U.S. per day.

In response to Bernie and the bureaucrats at the U.N.,  one only has to examine the living conditions of those they classify as living in extreme poverty.  They typically have air conditioning, computers, DVD players, and cellphones. They rarely report material hardships such as hunger, eviction, or having utilities cut off.

Little wonder that many of those considered middle class or even well-off among the UNHC’s member nations would gladly trade places with those classified as living in extreme poverty here in the U.S.

Shortly after that report came out Ambassador Nikki Haley announced our withdrawal from the Commission, calling the organization “a protector of human rights abusers, and a cesspool of political bias.”

Of course, Bernie did not consider the extreme poverty or living conditions for those in China’s re-education or forced labor camps.  Nor did he mention the poverty of spirit that exists when one’s family member is killed for his vital organs or one is forcibly aborted or her baby killed shortly after birth or the persecution one suffers from going to an unauthorized church.

3 thoughts on “Educating Bernie

  1. Well…I have seen MANY, many people…including children under 18 living in “extreme poverty” in the US. Why NOT demand that Bernie Sanders EXPLAIN further just how China has “eliminated extreme poverty”? Of course, SOME of their policies involve some form of dictatorial governance, but PERHAPS some of them don’t. Imagine that. If…at a minimum, we’re not willing to find out…we should just stick our heads in the sand…..and vote for Trump. lmao


    1. It makes me wonder if you have every really seen “extreme” poverty. To do that you need to go to Haiti or India. Most people here in the U.S. have no idea what that is like. If you have seen children living like that you need to report their welfare mother or drunken parents to law enforcement or social services.


  2. Very well said, Mrs. Chastain. It is good to see you educating the youth in such dire need of hearing the truth which is not issued in government schools.
    I remember when you started on Channel 4! I was born in Hollywood in 1946 and cherish growing up in the 50s. : )


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s