New Congress: Does it have the Stomach for real Reform?

The new Congress began with something quite extraordinary, a reading of the U.S. Constitution.

One of the new rules imposed by the new GOP leaders is also quite extraordinary: The author of every bill must submit a “statement citing, as specifically as practicable, the power or powers granted to Congress in the Constitution to enact” it.

Just how many of our established federal programs or agencies are Constitutional?

These new Republican leaders didn’t come into power with a long list of priorities.  They recognize that they were handed the keys to the lower chamber for one reason and one reason alone:  cut spending.

While it is unlikely that they can eliminate the large, entrenched, unconstitutional programs without the cooperation of the Senate and the president, they do have the ability to whittle away at their budgets and prevent any more from being establishment.

This is huge!   It’s enough to give hope to weary taxpayers everywhere . . . but call me suspicious!

This is a marathon and not a sprint.  Any seasoned athlete will tell you that it’s not so important how you began a marathon, but how you finish.

There are two major stumbling blocks which can be found in the Constitution itself: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause.   The General Welfare Clause appears twice, in the Preamble and in Article 1 Section 8.  The Commerce Clause also can be found in Section 8.  Over the years, these terms have been defined and redefined.

The Commerce Clause has been expanded to the point that it has allowed the federal government to regulate the mud puddle in your back yard.  Yes, interstate commerce occurs on the nation’s navigable waterways.  All water that doesn’t evaporate could eventually make its way into one of these waterways.  Connect these dots and voila!   That’s the kind of lame excuse that liberal lawmakers and activist judges have used to allow the federal government to worm its way into matters that should be left up to individuals and states.

The federal government has used the Commerce Clause to regulate virtually anything that travels across state lines or anything touched by these products, people and yes, even animals.  And the object of said regulation doesn’t necessarily have to be “touched.”   Ever heard of the “glancing goose test”?

If a migrating bird (assumed to be engaged in some form of interstate commerce) might glance over its shoulder and spot a small pond or wetland appropriate for landing that is enough to allow the feds to regulate it.

The expansion of the Commerce Clause pales beside the shenanigans used to apply the General Welfare Clause.   Conservatives believe that this clause applies only to the welfare of the country as a whole.   But the game of every liberal since our founding has been to expand the clause to cover every need or want that can be imagined.

Clearly, the debate over these weighty issues is not going to be settled by simply requiring members to state the clause in the Constitution that they believe justifies bills that expand the federal government or the welfare state.  The  Court regularly points out that the primary limitation on the unwise exercise of the Commerce Clause must be found at the ballot box.   The same applies to the exercise of the General Welfare Clause.

These new leaders have to have the guts to stand on principle and say, “We are not going to allow these bills to see the light of day!”  They also must have the guts to stand against the unions, entrenched bureaucrats and poverty pimps who will take to the streets when one of their fiefdoms is being cut.

Those who are affected will cry to the media about all the valuable services that are being scaled back or eliminated – services that are performed with half the manpower at a fraction of the cost by the private sector.  They will cry about children starving and widows being thrown into the streets.  Presently there are 122 different federal anti-poverty programs, many of them overlapping, wasteful and counterproductive, but you will hear the wailing so be prepared for it.

It has to happen at some point.  If these new GOP leaders are really up for it, we can do it now or we can wait until there are even more coddled government workers and more people on the public dole.

The overreach of the federal government has crippled our economy and the expansion of the welfare state is taking us over a cliff financially from which there will be no recovery.

Bring it on!

2 thoughts on “New Congress: Does it have the Stomach for real Reform?

  1. As I contemplate the outrageous facts of how and what our “public servants” spend OUR HARD EARNED DOLLARS ON, I actually feel sick! I didn’t vote on this stuff! The time has come for Americans to reclaim our government. We must somehow become united. Political affiliation is not an issue. The issue is so much bigger that political parties! It is about “We the people……bestowed by God (not government) with certain unalienable rights….life, liberty and the persuit of happiness……”. The main concern of our “public servants” is not to maintain this “perfect union”, do it’s duty which is basically to protect our borders and see that contracts are maintained…..not the running of the post office, schools, medical, banks, auto industry…..the list goes on….but rather, to steal more and more of our hard earned money under the guise of “protecting our children, helping our elderly…..etc”, as we obviously are not capable of such. No amount will ever be enough for them. It must be a very powerful “high” experienced by these politicos as they will stop at nothing to keep the money (money they have not earned) flowing into their hands to maintain their life style and their “high”. Check out Obama’s Christmas vacation in Hawaii and the tab which tax payers will pay… is beyond comprehension that this President feels it is appropriate for him and his family to be treated as a God while so many Americans are just barely able to feed their family. Not to mention the fact that our current President can not even prove his citizenship. And where is the press in all this? Why is it so difficult for Americans to obtain the basic facts?
    I remain optimistic in that Americans are not stupid. We are just so good natured and wanting to believe the best in everything, that it takes us a very long time to “get it”. Once we do “get it”, look out because the giant will once again be awakened.


  2. When true blue conservative candidates prepare to run f or elective office, they ought to be taught how to hold their own with pesky old Mr. Moneybags, that lifelong Rockefeller Republican who wastes no time contacting conservative candidates and lecturing them to “move to the middle” or “get away from those right-wing nuts”. In reality, Mr. Moneybags never liked Ronald Reagan because he wasn’t from a patrician background. He must be shown the door.

    I think that true blue conservatives able to hold their own in the political arena with long lists of small donors and a handful of mid-sized donors will be willing to press ahead with needed reforms.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s